If you saw our video of words derived from numbers earlier this month, you’ll know that March 14 was Pi Day (or rather, the once-in-a-century Rounded-Up Pi Day), because when it’s written out numerically the date “3.14.16” forms the first few digits of

*pi*.
Besides our mathematically-themed video, however, over on the

**HaggardHawks**Twitter feed we marked Pi Day with this fairly remarkable fact:The FEYNMAN POINT is a series of six consecutive 9s in the 762nd-767th decimal places of pi. #PiDay pic.twitter.com/5ZyAZQs66x— HaggardHawks Words (@HaggardHawks) 14 March 2016

Now. We’re not mathematicians here at

**HaggardHawks**, and frankly the very idea of discussing the irrationality of an approximation of the mathematical constant representing the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diametzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…
Only joking, mathematicians, we love you really. But even dusty, bookish old wordsmiths like us can find some interest in mathematics every so often, and the Feynman Point is one of those times. So we thought you might like to know a little bit more about the point behind The Point.

The “Feynman” of the Feynman Point is the American theoretical physicist Richard Feynman. In a lifetime of achievement and accomplishment, Feynman did everything from helping develop the atomic bomb to assisting in the commission that investigated the Challenger disaster in 1986. He was also jointly awarded the 1965 Nobel Prize for Physics for his “fundamental work in quantum electrodynamics”, including his groundbreaking work on quantum path integral formulation challenging the existing notion of a unique quantum trajectory by replacing it with a functional integralzzzzzzzzzz…

Only joking, physicists, we love you as well. But long story short, Richard Feynman was a brilliant scientist—and he was also very interested in π.

According to the story, during a lecture at the California Institute of Technology, Feynman joked to his students that he would one day like to memorize

*pi*up to the point, 762 decimal places in, that there are six consecutive nines. Why? Well, he wanted reach that particular repdigit and then state “...999999, and so on”, implying that the famously irrational π suddenly, 762 places in, becomes nothing more than an infinite chain of 9s.
Regrettably there’s little evidence that Feynman ever actually made that joke (and in fact the earliest account of it credits it to fellow scientist Douglas Hofstader), but it’s Feynman’s name that has ended up being attached to these six consecutive 9s, and its his name that has remained in place ever since.

Incidentally, another six consecutive 9s crop up in the 193,034th–193,039th decimal places of pi. Anyone fancy memorizing up to there? You could get your name in the dictionary if you do...

Incidentally, another six consecutive 9s crop up in the 193,034th–193,039th decimal places of pi. Anyone fancy memorizing up to there? You could get your name in the dictionary if you do...

The Feym of the Feymous Feynman point is hightly overrated for several reasons: First a 999999 was bound to crop up within the first million digits or so (why would we expect it to wait till the millionth digit. The chance of 999999 appearing somewhere within any randomly chosen segment of 678 is almost one percent. Since the digits of Pi are not really randomly distributed but just appear so, we really should expect 999999 to appear exactly where it is. God didn't PLAN for it to be there. If GOD wanted us to be practical he would have placed it at digit 7 rather than at digit 762 as a hint that we could safely represent it a 355/113 and round it off to be 3.141593 and avoid trying to get it any closer than that. The second reason it is highly overrated is that in base 2-8 it doesn't appear at all (888888 is the big deal in octal) and FFFFFF is the big deal in hexadecimal. So lets just pretend that Pi is rational. It is the rational thing to do because it easier to memorize 3.1415930000000... to a hundred digits (or 3.141592999999... if you prefer.) And the error you get on the circumference of a circular swimming pool with a diameter of a hundred meters would be about 3 hundreths of a millimeter if you just use 355/113 Chances are it will be off by a thousand times more than that just due to construction errors. Enough said!

ReplyDeleteReally? Obviously you don't understand the term quip.

Delete